{"id":1599813,"date":"2025-11-27T08:00:57","date_gmt":"2025-11-27T13:00:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/observer.com\/?p=1599813"},"modified":"2025-11-13T07:34:59","modified_gmt":"2025-11-13T12:34:59","slug":"wicked-why-fictional-words-cast-such-a-spell-on-us","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/observer.com\/2025\/11\/wicked-why-fictional-words-cast-such-a-spell-on-us\/","title":{"rendered":"Defying Definition: Why Fictional Words Cast Such a Spell On Us"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_1599820\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1599820\" style=\"width: 970px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/?attachment_id=1599820\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-1599820\" data-lasso-id=\"2866747\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full-width wp-image-1599820\" src=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/The-BFG-2016.jpg?quality=80&amp;w=970\" alt=\"\" width=\"970\" height=\"546\" srcset=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/The-BFG-2016.jpg 3000w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/The-BFG-2016.jpg?resize=300,169 300w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/The-BFG-2016.jpg?resize=768,432 768w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/The-BFG-2016.jpg?resize=635,357 635w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/The-BFG-2016.jpg?resize=1536,864 1536w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/The-BFG-2016.jpg?resize=2048,1152 2048w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/The-BFG-2016.jpg?resize=970,546 970w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/The-BFG-2016.jpg?resize=320,180 320w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/The-BFG-2016.jpg?resize=1920,1080 1920w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/The-BFG-2016.jpg?resize=50,28 50w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 135px, 200px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-1599820\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Sniglets in the BFG include \u201cscrumdiddlyumptious,\u201d \u201cwhizzpopper\u201d and \u201ctrogglehumper.\u201d <span class=\"media-credit\">Courtesy Disney and Amblin Entertainment<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Have you ever felt \u201cdisgustikafied,\u201d been branded a \u201crampallion\u201d or had a \u201cfrabjous\u201d day? Or are you totally, utterly and \u201ccompletriciously\u201d confused by these questions? If so, it\u2019s time to brush up on the art of made-up words, because <i>Wicked: For Good<\/i> is about to bring this brand of delightfully tongue-twisting dialogue back to the big screen.<\/p>\n<p>From \u201cscandalacious\u201d and \u201cdecipherate\u201d to \u201chideoteous,\u201d the musical sequel will weave dozens of nonsensical words into its script\u2014expressions that may raise our eyebrows and prick up our ears but will also spark the creative centers of our brains. And this tradition is far from new. Invented words have been a feature of novels, plays and poems for centuries, crafted to charm and challenge audiences in equal multisyllabic measure.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMade-up words\u2014sometimes called sniglets\u2014are one of the most fun parts of language,\u201d says Adele Goldberg, linguist and professor of psychology at Princeton University. \u201cCoining a new word can create a kind of secret handshake\u2014a sense of shared intimacy. Of course, the trick is that new words only work if people understand them.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><i>Wicked,<\/i> in turn, understands this caveat. Words like \u201cgratitution\u201d and \u201cprivishly\u201d may be invented, yet there\u2019s still a certain sense to their nonsense. Each <i>Wicked<\/i> word has an identifiable root, with the added suffixes serving simply as fantastical flourishes. \u201cAnd there\u2019s a certain playfulness to drawing out or reshaping familiar expressions,\u201d Goldberg adds, citing \u201ccutie-patootie\u201d as a prime example. \u201c<i>Wicked\u2019s<\/i> oddball coinages seem to make use of that. They\u2019re absurd, but joyfully so.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This too is an age-old approach. Shakespeare, for example, coined \u201cbrabble\u201d by splicing together parts of \u201cbicker\u201d and \u201csquabble.\u201d This seems almost like cheating\u2014creating a new word from concepts that already fit together, thus sparing the audience any heavy linguistic lifting. But many modern examples follow the same pattern: \u201changry,\u201d \u201csmog\u201d and \u201cbrunch\u201d sound so natural and catch on so quickly because they blend familiar ideas in a concise way. \u201cThey often feel witty because they capture something that\u2019s been hiding in plain sight,\u201d explains Goldberg. \u201cAnd that same wink of familiarity can come from twisting an old word into a new use\u2014say, <i>Wicked<\/i> \u2018out-snigletted\u2019 itself.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Gary Lupyan, professor of psychology at the University of Wisconsin, also emphasizes the importance of context in understanding hitherto unseen words. \u201cWords like \u2018horrendible\u2019 in <i>Wicked,<\/i> by virtue of being so close to a conventional English word, can be understood when first encountered,\u201d he says. \u201cEspecially if they\u2019re also used in a context where one might expect a familiar word, such as \u2018horrible.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In these cases, our brains process made-up words much like any other. Even unfamiliar words trigger associations with similar-sounding forms we already know. \u201cAnd many are portmanteaus,\u201d says Lupyan, \u201citself a word that Lewis Carroll co-opted to mean made up of two parts, like a portmanteau type of suitcase.\u201d<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_1599821\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1599821\" style=\"width: 970px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/?attachment_id=1599821\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-1599821\" data-lasso-id=\"2866748\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"lazyload size-full-width wp-image-1599821\" src=\"data:image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAAAAACH5BAEKAAEALAAAAAABAAEAAAICTAEAOw==\" data-src=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Alice-in-Wonderland-2010.jpg?quality=80&amp;w=970\" alt=\"\" width=\"970\" height=\"545\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Alice-in-Wonderland-2010.jpg 4361w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Alice-in-Wonderland-2010.jpg?resize=300,168 300w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Alice-in-Wonderland-2010.jpg?resize=768,431 768w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Alice-in-Wonderland-2010.jpg?resize=635,357 635w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Alice-in-Wonderland-2010.jpg?resize=1536,863 1536w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Alice-in-Wonderland-2010.jpg?resize=2048,1150 2048w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Alice-in-Wonderland-2010.jpg?resize=970,545 970w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Alice-in-Wonderland-2010.jpg?resize=320,180 320w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Alice-in-Wonderland-2010.jpg?resize=1920,1078 1920w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Alice-in-Wonderland-2010.jpg?resize=50,28 50w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 135px, 200px\" \/><noscript><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"lazyload size-full-width wp-image-1599821\" src=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Alice-in-Wonderland-2010.jpg?quality=80&amp;w=970\" alt=\"\" width=\"970\" height=\"545\" srcset=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Alice-in-Wonderland-2010.jpg 4361w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Alice-in-Wonderland-2010.jpg?resize=300,168 300w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Alice-in-Wonderland-2010.jpg?resize=768,431 768w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Alice-in-Wonderland-2010.jpg?resize=635,357 635w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Alice-in-Wonderland-2010.jpg?resize=1536,863 1536w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Alice-in-Wonderland-2010.jpg?resize=2048,1150 2048w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Alice-in-Wonderland-2010.jpg?resize=970,545 970w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Alice-in-Wonderland-2010.jpg?resize=320,180 320w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Alice-in-Wonderland-2010.jpg?resize=1920,1078 1920w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Alice-in-Wonderland-2010.jpg?resize=50,28 50w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 135px, 200px\" \/><\/noscript><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-1599821\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Lewis Carroll was known for his charming sniglets, which include &#8220;frabjous&#8221; and &#8220;frumious.&#8221; <span class=\"media-credit\">Disney Enterprises, Inc \/ picture alliance \/ Mary Evans Pi<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Carroll is another giant of wordsmithing. Beyond inventing now-common words like \u201cchortle\u201d (which combined \u201cchuckle\u201d and \u201csnort\u201d), the <i>Alice\u2019s Adventures in Wonderland<\/i> author coined \u201cmimsy,\u201d \u201cgalumph\u201d and \u201cslithy.\u201d These words may be less ubiquitous than \u201cchortle,\u201d but we can still glean their meanings with relative ease. And yet, while Roman Klinger\u2014professor of language processing at Germany\u2019s University of Bamberg\u2014notes that evoking emotion isn\u2019t usually the primary goal of made-up words, he does concede that their use can invite a level of audience participation.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI\u2019d assume that words such as Lewis Carroll\u2019s \u2018frabjous\u2019 aren\u2019t developed first of all to express an emotional connection,\u201d he explains. \u201cIn art, ambiguity is an important element that allows readers to fill gaps themselves, with their own word knowledge and interpretation. Novels and poems often leave space for our own interpretations, and nonsense words leave a lot of space.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>So, while such words can stir emotions, they also provide ambiguity, keeping readers or audiences on their toes. Writers such as Roald Dahl and Dr. Seuss long employed neologisms in this way. Sometimes, however, their purpose is more straightforward: shaping character. In Shakespeare\u2019s <i>Henry IV, Part 2,<\/i> a flurry of inventive, acerbic slights\u2014\u201cYou scullion, you rampallian, you fustilarian!\u201d\u2014tells audiences almost as much about the insult-slinger as it does the slingee.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAnd, by letting fictional characters use words that aren\u2019t part of the established vocabulary,\u201d says Daniela Landert, professor of English linguistics at Heidelberg University, \u201cthey become recognizable through their language use.\u201d She adds that <i>Buffy the Vampire Slayer<\/i> famously used made-up words (\u201cslayage,\u201d \u201csitch\u201d and \u201ccleavagy\u201d) to strengthen the identities of and bond between the show\u2019s protagonists.<\/p>\n<p>Occasionally, Landert adds, invented words are bigger than the stories that contain them. \u201cSometimes,\u201d she says, \u201cthey create humor and audience engagement by inviting readers to reflect on the wider use of language and the meaning of words. Take Carroll\u2019s <i>Jabberwocky,<\/i> for instance.\u201d Yet whether it\u2019s \u201cvorpal,\u201d \u201cgrinch\u201d or \u201cscrumdiddlyumptious,\u201d the most common function of these neologisms remains to immerse\u2014to introduce audiences to new worlds\u2014from Whoville to Wonderland to Oz\u2014without losing us in them.<\/p>\n<p>In <i>Wicked,<\/i> Lupyan observes, these words form a particularly firm foundation. \u201cCompare \u2018horrendible\u2019 with more conventional terms like \u2018horrible\u2019 or \u2018horrendous,\u2019\u201d he says. \u201cIt\u2019s less about communicating a different sense of \u2018horrible\u2019 than about immersing the audience in a world where things are a little different, weird and whimsical. Rather than communicating a specific meaning that conventional words could not, it\u2019s a world-building function.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>And that\u2019s why these words enchant us. Goldberg, noting that \u201clanguage play thrives in that sweet spot between the known and the new,\u201d explains that while some neologisms invite ambiguity, most\u2014like those in <i>Wicked<\/i>\u2014are there to guide, inform and entertain us, albeit in a semantically subversive way. \u201cIt\u2019s where recognition meets surprise,\u201d she says. \u201cThat\u2019s where our \u2018sniglets,\u2019 \u2018smoglets\u2019 and \u2018hangry\u2019 moments live\u2014and where language keeps reminding us it\u2019s a game we all get to play.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It\u2019s time to brush up on the art of the sniglet, because &#8216;Wicked: For Good&#8217; is about to bring familiar yet fantastical and tongue-twisting neologisms back to the big screen.<\/p>\n <a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/2025\/11\/wicked-why-fictional-words-cast-such-a-spell-on-us\/\">Read More<\/a>","protected":false},"author":177935309,"featured_media":1599825,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"apple_news_api_created_at":"","apple_news_api_id":"","apple_news_api_modified_at":"","apple_news_api_revision":"","apple_news_api_share_url":"","apple_news_cover_media_provider":"image","apple_news_coverimage":0,"apple_news_coverimage_caption":"","apple_news_cover_video_id":0,"apple_news_cover_video_url":"","apple_news_cover_embedwebvideo_url":"","apple_news_is_hidden":"","apple_news_is_paid":"","apple_news_is_preview":"","apple_news_is_sponsored":"","apple_news_maturity_rating":"","apple_news_metadata":"\"\"","apple_news_pullquote":"","apple_news_pullquote_position":"","apple_news_slug":"","apple_news_sections":[],"apple_news_suppress_video_url":false,"apple_news_use_image_component":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"post_tag":[423808455,423837487],"company":[],"channel":[423806452,423868939,423868969],"location":[],"nyo_column":[],"person":[424004396,424004397,423924543,424004398,423899798,423886297,424004399,423942304],"nyo_post_hidden":[],"coauthor":[424004395],"class_list":{"0":"post-1599813","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"tag-fiction","8":"tag-linguistics","9":"channel-books","10":"channel-movies","11":"channel-culture","12":"nyo_person-adele-goldberg","13":"nyo_person-gary-lupyan","14":"nyo_person-lewis-carroll","15":"nyo_person-roman-klinger","16":"nyo_person-roald-dahl","17":"nyo_person-dr-seuss","18":"nyo_person-daniela-landert","19":"nyo_person-william-shakespeare"},"acf":{"homepage_position":"","homepage_title":"","homepage_excerpt":"","alternative_og_image":"","headline":{"seo_headline":""},"subheadline":{"optimized_seo_description":"","optimized_social_excerpt":""}},"apple_news_notices":[],"parsely":{"version":"1.1.0","canonical_url":"https:\/\/observer.com\/2025\/11\/wicked-why-fictional-words-cast-such-a-spell-on-us\/","smart_links":{"inbound":0,"outbound":0},"traffic_boost_suggestions_count":0,"meta":[],"rendered":"","tracker_url":"https:\/\/cdn.parsely.com\/keys\/observer.com\/p.js"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/GettyImages-2246076466.jpg?quality=80","coauthors_byline":"By Jonathan Wells","display_channel":"","thumbnail":"<img width=\"300\" height=\"225\" src=\"data:image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAAAAACH5BAEKAAEALAAAAAABAAEAAAICTAEAOw==\" data-src=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/GettyImages-2246076466.jpg?quality=80&amp;w=300&amp;h=225&amp;crop=1\" class=\"lazyload attachment-grid-thumbnail size-grid-thumbnail\" alt=\"&quot;Wicked: For Good&quot; European Premiere - Arrivals\" decoding=\"async\" \/><noscript><img width=\"300\" height=\"225\" src=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/GettyImages-2246076466.jpg?quality=80&amp;w=300&amp;h=225&amp;crop=1\" class=\"lazyload attachment-grid-thumbnail size-grid-thumbnail\" alt=\"&quot;Wicked: For Good&quot; European Premiere - Arrivals\" decoding=\"async\" \/><\/noscript>","classes":["post-1599813","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","tag-fiction","tag-linguistics","channel-books","channel-movies","channel-culture","nyo_person-adele-goldberg","nyo_person-gary-lupyan","nyo_person-lewis-carroll","nyo_person-roman-klinger","nyo_person-roald-dahl","nyo_person-dr-seuss","nyo_person-daniela-landert","nyo_person-william-shakespeare","entry-grid"],"parent_channels":"Culture","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/GettyImages-2246076466.jpg?quality=80&#038;w=300&#038;h=225&#038;crop=1","thumbnail_url_2x":"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/GettyImages-2246076466.jpg?quality=80&#038;w=600&#038;h=450","excerpt_bare":"It\u2019s time to brush up on the art of the sniglet, because 'Wicked: For Good' is about to bring familiar yet fantastical and tongue-twisting neologisms back to the big screen.","is_sponsored":false,"formatted_date":"Nov 27","read_time":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"amp_enabled":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1599813","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/177935309"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1599813"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1599813\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1599873,"href":"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1599813\/revisions\/1599873"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1599825"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1599813"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post_tag?post=1599813"},{"taxonomy":"observer_company","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/company?post=1599813"},{"taxonomy":"channel","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/channel?post=1599813"},{"taxonomy":"location","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/location?post=1599813"},{"taxonomy":"nyo_column","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/nyo_column?post=1599813"},{"taxonomy":"nyo_person","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/person?post=1599813"},{"taxonomy":"nyo_post_hidden","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/nyo_post_hidden?post=1599813"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthor?post=1599813"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}